Glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a

Прочитал glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a разделяю Ваше мнение

The other verbs that sometimes accompany passive clauses include come, get, go, have, hear, make, need, see, and a phsrmaceuticals others (though there are all sorts of limitations on the constructions that different verbs require).

Here are a few examples, with glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a main clause verb boldfaced and the passive VP underlined: Mary got arrested at the Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone)- FDA yesterday. Try not to get your private life discussed by the newspapers. I saw him attacked by a flock of birds. I had this made for me by a carpenter. Susan had her car stolen out of her driveway last week.

The glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a with the building went unnoticed by the owners for weeks. This software comes pre-installed by the manufacturers. All of these examples will typically go unidentified as passives if you ask bad writing tutors or trust bad grammar-checking programs.

In fir of the examples so far, the NP unexpressed in the VP is a direct object.

Transitive verbs like arrest, discuss, attack, make, notice, install, etc. In a passive, it is the NP that turns up as the subject. But this is one more thing that is not always true in passives, but only sometimes.

First, the non-subject NP can be an indirect object. That's what we see here:Second, more interestingly, the non-subject NP can be inside a PP: it can be the complement of a preposition in the active.

All the verbs that take goaxosmithkline clause complements can take prepositional passives. In the following examples the passive clause is underlined, but I don't bother to show the gap after the stranded preposition: Mary got picked on at the demonstration yesterday. Don't get your private life talked about by the newspapers.

I saw him pecked at by a flock of birds. I had glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a worked on by a carpenter. If you've ever had your poetry laughed at by an audience you'll know how I glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a. Glaxodmithkline problems with the building went unlooked glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a by the owners for a long time.

In English the prepositional passive is quite frequent, especially roche site relatively informal style.

Most languages don't have anything like it (Norwegian is a rare example of a language that does). There are some peculiar restrictions on prepositional passives in English. One is that there can be a difference in acceptability glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a to whether the subject denotes an entity that is tangibly altered in state: This bottom bunk has been slept in is dramatically more acceptable than?.

The bottom bunk has been glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a above, apparently phaarmaceuticals sleeping in a bunk bed alters its state (the sheets are wrinkled and so on), while sleeping in the top bunk above it doesn't alter its state at all. Intuitively, you use a prepositional passive when the VP expresses a relevantly important property of the subject.

That's a restriction on prepositional passives, because there is nothing peculiar about the active version Someone has slept above this bottom bunk. The participle in a passive clause is nearly always a past Human IgG1О» Monoclonal Antibody Intravenous Infusion (Raxibacumab)- FDA, but not quite always: most dialects of English have a construction called the concealed passive in which the verb of the passive clause is in the gerund-participle form, the one that ends in -ing.

Most commonly a concealed passive clause involves the verb need, as in these examples: It needed washing anyway. That rash needs looking at by a specialist. In these examples washing and looking are gerund-participles, but the sense is still clearly the one that indicates the passive - the subject of wash does not denote the person glaxosmitykline does the washing, and the subject of look does not denote the specialist.

For some speakers there are a few verbs other than need that allow this construction. Want may allow it, for example. In the 18th century there was another passive-like construction with a gerund-participle: the so-called passival, as in His tooth was pulling out by a dentist, where a gerund-participle is the complement of be. I am not dealing here with glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a case of those few transitive glaxosmirhkline that are sometimes used intransitively with the subject understood the way the object would have been understood: cases like His books sell quite well, which means something like "The enterprise of selling his books goes quite well" (notice that sell is not a participle).

This construction is sometimes called the middle. It clearly differs from the passive: it can't take glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a by-phrase. You can of course leave out all reference to glaxismithkline agent in a passive, precisely because the agent isn't the subject, and psychedelic the subject is fully and always obligatory in a tensed clause: The mayor had the building torn down.

That doesn't express the identity of the destructive agent at all - though in this case the source of the authority is clear enough, so there's no evasiveness about responsibility. The context might be one in which we don't know which company did it, pharmadeuticals glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a company could have, and it doesn't glxxosmithkline which one it was.

But you don't have to leave the agent unexpressed in glaxosmighkline passive. You could say this: The mayor had the building torn down by his brother's demolition company. The demolition agent is specified here, as you might want it to be if corrupt awarding of city contracts was suspected.

So notice that the passive construction has absolutely nothing to do with the notion of being vague about agency: you glaxomsithkline be as explicit as you want to be about who or what did the stuff that the clause talks about, and whether you use a by-phrase may not even matter. The passive is often better suited to being explicit about agency than the active is, because the end of the verb phrase is an ideal place to put something you want to emphasize: Don't you see.

The patient was murdered by pharmaceutical own doctor!. There's no vagueness or evasiveness about whodunnit there: it whacks you in the face with the identity of the murderer.

If you want to name names and point fingers, there's often no better way to do it than with a passive construction. Let me now add a reminder about a point made earlier: we have been talking about actions like damaging, tearing down, murdering, and so on. These denote actions affecting physical objects. Not all verbs are like this. J glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a followed by K is a passive clause, glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a it doesn't talk about anybody doing anything to anything.

It just has a passice VP with a past participle, and its subject is understood the way the object would be understood in the earlier example K follows J. Key glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a The passive construction glaxosmithkline pharmaceuticals c a not defined in terms of active agents doing things to affected entities.

After all, sometimes nothing is doing anything to anything: consider It is believed to have been snowing at the time, where believed is the verb of a passive clause but it isn't by any stretch of the imagination a thing that someone believes.



12.02.2020 in 04:52 Felkis:
At you inquisitive mind :)

14.02.2020 in 14:01 Arashiramar:
Rather valuable idea

16.02.2020 in 06:43 Kazramuro:
It is a shame!

18.02.2020 in 10:22 Yozshucage:
Now all is clear, I thank for the help in this question.